国際民主主義・人権確保協会
Archive Moderation Guidelines
International Association for the Protection of Democracy and Human Rights (IAPDHR)
Effective Date: November 9, 2026 | Last Updated: November 9, 2026
1. Purpose and Scope
The International Association for the Protection of Democracy and Human Rights (IAPDHR) maintains and manages its digital archives to preserve information, promote public awareness, support research, and document developments concerning democracy, human rights, freedom, justice, and the rule of law around the world.
These Archive Moderation Guidelines establish the standards and procedures for submitting, reviewing, publishing, organizing, preserving, correcting, and removing materials from our archives.
They apply to all individuals and organizations submitting materials and to all personnel responsible for managing IAPDHR's archival platforms.
2. Our Archival Mission
Our archives aim to serve as a responsible and accessible information resource for researchers, journalists, students, human rights advocates, policymakers, and the general public.
The archive may contain:
- Human rights reports and research publications.
- Democratic and political development records.
- Historical documents and official records.
- News reports and media publications.
- Photographs, videos, and documentary evidence.
- Personal testimonies and eyewitness accounts.
- Statements from civil society organizations.
- Reports concerning discrimination, persecution, and violations of fundamental freedoms.
- Educational and academic materials.
- International declarations, agreements, and institutional publications.
Our objective is to preserve information responsibly while respecting accuracy, privacy, intellectual property, and individual dignity.
3. Submission Requirements
Individuals, researchers, organizations, journalists, and other contributors may submit materials for consideration.
Submissions should:
- Be relevant to democracy, human rights, justice, freedom, or related subjects.
- Include a clear title and description.
- Identify the original source whenever possible.
- Include publication dates, locations, and authorship information where available.
- Provide supporting documents or references when appropriate.
- Respect copyright and applicable privacy laws.
- Avoid fabricated, manipulated, or deliberately misleading evidence.
IAPDHR reserves the right to request additional information before accepting a submission.
4. Editorial Review and Verification
All submitted materials may be subject to editorial and moderation review before publication. Our review process may consider:
- A. Source Reliability. Whether the material originates from an identifiable, credible, or reasonably verifiable source.
- B. Factual Accuracy. Whether the information is supported by documentary evidence, reliable references, or clearly identified firsthand accounts.
- C. Context and Authenticity. Whether photographs, videos, documents, quotations, and other evidence are presented accurately and in their proper context.
- D. Public Interest. Whether publication contributes meaningfully to public understanding of democracy or human rights.
- E. Legal and Ethical Considerations. Whether publication creates unreasonable privacy, safety, defamation, copyright, or other legal risks.
- F. Right of Response. Where appropriate, individuals or institutions named in serious allegations may be given an opportunity to respond before publication.
Publication does not automatically constitute independent verification of every statement contained in a submitted document.
5. Content Classification and Source Transparency
To maintain transparency, IAPDHR may classify archival materials using the following categories:
- Verified: Material independently checked against sufficient reliable evidence.
- Official Record: Documents or statements issued by an identifiable government, institution, or organization. Official status does not necessarily establish the accuracy of every claim.
- Documented Report: Information supported by identifiable documents or credible references.
- Testimony: A personal account or eyewitness statement that has not necessarily been independently corroborated.
- Under Review: Material awaiting further verification or editorial assessment.
- Historical Reference: Material preserved primarily for historical, educational, or research purposes.
These classifications help users distinguish established facts, official statements, allegations, personal accounts, and information that remains under examination.
6. Prohibited and Restricted Materials
IAPDHR does not permit the publication of materials that:
- Directly incite violence or encourage unlawful attacks.
- Contain credible threats or targeted harassment.
- Promote hatred or discrimination against individuals or groups.
- Include fabricated evidence presented as authentic.
- Deliberately misrepresent photographs, videos, or historical records.
- Reveal private personal information without an appropriate legal basis.
- Expose confidential sources or vulnerable individuals to unreasonable danger.
- Infringe copyright or other protected rights without authorization or a valid legal exception.
- Contain malicious software, fraudulent links, or harmful files.
- Exploit or expose children to inappropriate or dangerous content.
Content involving graphic violence, death, torture, or other disturbing human rights documentation may be retained when justified by legitimate historical, journalistic, educational, or public-interest purposes. Such content may require warnings, access restrictions, or contextual explanations.
7. Political Neutrality and Editorial Independence
IAPDHR is committed to applying consistent human rights and democratic standards across all countries, governments, political movements, and institutions.
Our archive is not intended to serve as a propaganda platform for any political party, government, or ideological movement.
Accordingly:
- Content is assessed according to evidence, relevance, and editorial standards rather than political affiliation.
- Different perspectives may be included when relevant and appropriate.
- Criticism of governments, political institutions, or public officials is not automatically grounds for removal.
- Peaceful political opinions and legitimate criticism must not be suppressed merely because they are controversial.
- Allegations must be clearly distinguished from established facts.
- Editorial decisions should be based on documented reasons rather than political pressure.
- The inclusion of any material does not necessarily indicate endorsement by IAPDHR.
8. Moderation Actions
Depending on the nature of a submission or published material, IAPDHR may:
- Approve and publish the material.
- Request clarification or supporting evidence.
- Add contextual notes or verification labels.
- Edit titles, descriptions, or formatting without changing the substantive meaning.
- Add privacy or content warnings.
- Temporarily restrict access while investigating a complaint.
- Reject submissions that fail to meet our standards.
- Correct, archive, anonymize, or remove published materials when justified.
Moderation actions should be proportionate, documented where appropriate, and consistent with these Guidelines.
9. Corrections and Requests for Review
IAPDHR recognizes the importance of correcting inaccuracies and maintaining the integrity of its archives. Individuals or organizations may request:
- Correction of factual errors.
- Addition of relevant supporting evidence.
- Inclusion of a response or clarification.
- Review of potentially misleading or outdated material.
- Removal or anonymization of unlawfully published personal information.
- Reconsideration of a moderation decision.
Requests should include:
- The relevant archive URL or document title.
- A clear explanation of the concern.
- Supporting evidence or references.
- Contact information for follow-up.
All requests will be assessed individually. Submitting a complaint does not automatically guarantee removal of material.
10. Protection of Sources and Sensitive Information
IAPDHR understands that sources, witnesses, researchers, and human rights defenders may face risks when sharing sensitive information. We therefore seek to:
- Avoid unnecessary publication of personal addresses, telephone numbers, and identifying details.
- Protect confidential source information where legally and operationally possible.
- Consider the potential consequences of identifying vulnerable individuals.
- Remove or obscure sensitive details where publication is not necessary for legitimate public-interest purposes.
- Restrict access to confidential materials where appropriate.
We encourage contributors to clearly identify confidential or sensitive information when submitting materials.
11. Copyright and Intellectual Property
Contributors must ensure that they own or have permission to submit and publish materials.
Where third-party materials are included, proper attribution and source references should be provided.
IAPDHR respects intellectual property rights and will review credible copyright complaints. Where appropriate, disputed material may be temporarily restricted pending review.
12. Appeals Process
Individuals or organizations affected by an archival moderation decision may submit a written appeal. Appeals should explain:
- The moderation decision being challenged.
- Why the decision is believed to be incorrect.
- Any additional evidence or relevant information.
- The requested resolution.
Where practicable, appeals will be reviewed by an authorized person who was not directly responsible for the original decision. IAPDHR will communicate its decision and, where appropriate, provide a brief explanation.
13. Preservation and Historical Integrity
IAPDHR recognizes that archival materials may have significant historical, educational, or public-interest value.
Where legally permissible, we may preserve records even when they are disputed, outdated, or subject to correction. In such cases, we may add explanatory notes, correction notices, updated information, or access restrictions rather than permanently deleting the original record.
Archival preservation does not imply endorsement, verification, or agreement with the content.
14. Transparency and Accountability
IAPDHR seeks to maintain responsible and transparent archival management. Where appropriate and feasible, we may publish information about:
- Our moderation standards.
- Significant corrections.
- Material removals and restrictions.
- General categories of complaints.
- Changes to archival policies.
We continuously seek to improve our editorial practices and strengthen public confidence in the reliability of our archives.
15. Amendments to These Guidelines
IAPDHR may revise these Guidelines to reflect changes in applicable law, international human rights standards, technological developments, and organizational practices.
The latest version will be published on our official website.
16. Contact and Archive Complaints
For archival submissions, corrections, copyright concerns, privacy complaints, or moderation appeals, please contact:
- International Association for the Protection of Democracy and Human Rights (IAPDHR)
- Location: Japan
- Website: [Official Website]
- Archive & Editorial Contact: [Official Contact Email]